Author Archives: Mike

My roots are in Youngstown, Ohio, but my tree is currently in Boston where I'm a grad student in organic chemistry. Photography is my little hobby and this blog is how I'm sharing it.

Mirror, Mirror

There’s a couple really exciting things happening in the photography world. The first is that the art is getting much more affordable and approachable. Cameras themselves are getting less expensive, but more importantly, does anyone remember that it used to cost $10-15 for 36 pictures on decent 35mm film? The second thing is that the technology is progressing at an alarming rate – suddenly everyone with a smartphone has a camera that can out-shoot virtually any first or second generation DSLR. Whoa.

 

Still though, there are certain limitations to super-tiny cameras. By and large, tiny pixels aren’t as good in low-light and imperfections in small lenses are more problematic than for larger lenses. And speaking of lenses – you’re stuck with the one it came with. Boo. For the longest time, there was nothing to bridge the DSLR and the point-and-shoot – then all of a sudden – wham. Mirrorless cameras. Drop the prism and drop the focusing screen, but keep the sensor large and allow for lens swapping so as to hold onto the versatility of a DSLR. Software can take care of the focusing using contrast-detection and a few models are employing phase-detection voodoo between pixels on the sensor (this is a good thing). Suddenly, you have a barebones DSLR in a package a third of the size and weight. As it turns out, we were in the market to find just such a camera because we wanted one that we could easily take out with us, but also something with a little more horsepower than a typical point-and-shoot.

 

After doing our research, we landed on the Sony NEX-6. There are a lot of cameras out there, and so many good choices. We liked the idea of having a nice, big, DX-size sensor (mirrorless full-frame, though amazing, is more than we were interested in paying) and the NEX has a lot of cool features for quick focusing and so on. We skipped the kit zoom lens and opted for a pair of primes – a 30mm 2.8 and 50mm 1.8.

 

What’s the verdict? We love it! There have actually been a number of times I assumed a picture was from our DSLR only to find out that it was from the mirrorless. It’s been hard to get used to the tiny viewfinder or looking at the rear display when taking pictures, but otherwise it’s quite a capable little beast. Crazy time we live in.

 

wide-1 wide-22wide-1 wide-3 wide-4 wide-5 wideagain-1 wideagain-2

chemical photography

I’ve never been a fan of calling film photography ‘analog’ photography. I think people just assigned this name because like clocks, the digital version is new and the analog version is old.

 

But, an analog device is governed by oscillating mass or current/voltage/magnetism. Film photography is chemical. You’re using light to burn an image onto the chemicals coated onto the film. Not only is this not analogous to most ‘analog’ media (no pun intended), it ignores just how awesome the process is and how brilliantly crafted film chemistry has to be. I could (and sometimes do) geek out on this stuff all day.

 

Anyhow – I’ve shot two rolls of 160NC over the past couple months and decided to dump what I’ve liked here on the blog. I’m a lot more careful when I shoot film. Partly because of the inconvenience of changing rolls, but much more so because of how long it takes to scan and de-dust each one. A wasted shot is quite annoying later in the game.

lg wide-1lg wide-2smwide-2 lg wide-3lg wide-4tall-1 lg wide-5smwide-3 lg wide-6 lg wide 2-1 lg wide 2-2smwide-1 lg wide 2-3smwide2-1 lg wide 2-4 lg wide 2-5

-M-

3 to 6 inches. plus or minus 12.

I just can’t express how happy I am that this has been a proper Boston winter. Last year was cold and wet but there just wasn’t any snow. I was only a couple weeks away from curling up in the fetal position before spring rolled around and rescued me. Nowadays, I’m wondering if the weather is compensating for last year’s poor performance.

A tidbit: When I pick out a lens to use on a given day, for some reason I have to go through a period of anxiety that somehow I’ll pick the wrong one and I’ll waste the whole day lugging around my camera wishing I had a different lens. In reality, this has almost never happened – I can make do with what I brought. Maybe it’s just because it’s morning and I’m groggy while processing this critical decision, but in any case, I always end up finding my morning self a little comical. The last two days I landed on a a wide-ish zoom (24-70) and a tele (80-200), and in a shocking turn of events, no prime. Aware that it’s entirely possible that this paragraph isn’t interesting at all, I’ll end it and leave you with the photos:

bigs-62wides-1bigs-32wides-3bigs-42wides-2bigs-2talls-1bigs-5

 

-M-